Google Webmaster Tools
 
Picture
How well do you know this woman? Do you want her to be the next Supreme Court justice? She's never been a judge, and her paper trail is short, but is that enough to prove that she is not a clear and present danger to the Constitution?

Share your feelings in this online poll.
5 Comments
 
 
Sometimes respect and honor take a while.

In 1543 Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus published his groundbreaking work De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres). That book proposed an astronomical model that put our sun, not the earth, in the center of the solar system. He published it in the same year as his death so as to avoid retribution from the Catholic Church. When he died, Copernicus was laid to rest in an unmarked grave, a most unassuming burial for such an important figure in modern science.

Copernicus finally got the respect he deserves. In May 2010 (nearly 500 years later) his body was exhumed and he was given a hero’s burial in the tomb of the cathedral where he labored as a church canon and doctor. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/after-467-years-copernicus-gets-a-heros-burial-1980493.html

In 1632 Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei published his work Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. The book argued in a somewhat hypothetical manner, that the sun, not the earth, is at the center of the solar system. Galileo was eventually arrested and given a trial by the Inquisition. He was guilty of heresy, of openly supporting and teaching sun-centered theories (heliocentrism). He was put under house arrest.

Galileo finally got the respect he deserves. In October 1992, Pope John Paul declared that the Inquisition had incorrectly convicted Galileo. In 1998 (over 400 years after Galileo death), the Church erected a statue of Galileo in the Vatican walls and the current Pope Benedict praised his contributions to astronomy. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/23/vatican-rewrites-history_n_153232.html

Finally there is Isaac Newton. Newton was an accomplished biblical scholar and theologian. He espoused two views that were considered vehemently heretical by most of Christendom (and still are). He believed that the Father and the Son are separate individuals. He also believed that there was an apostasy during his lifetime and that the true church of Jesus Christ was not upon the earth. He looked forward to its restoration.

Unfortunately, Newton has not yet gotten the respect he deserves for these two theological viewpoints. It may be a while before that respect comes – like, say, the Second Coming. At the Second Coming when the whole earth learns the truth about the godhead and the Restoration, I think Newton will get the respect he deserves. Of course, among the latter-day saints, he has already gotten the respect he deserves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton's_religious_views

 
3 Comments
 
 
A recent research report in the journal Pediatrics suggests that children of gay parents are not adversely affected by their parents’ sexual orientation. Results showed that kids raised by lesbian parents are psychologically well-adjusted and even experience fewer behavioral problems than kids raised by heterosexual parents. 

This report is creating quite a stir.

As a statistician and researcher who has both published and evaluated peer review articles for professional journals, there is always a room for debate when it comes to arguing the legitimacy of results. There are questions such as: Was the study adequately powered? What is the effect size? What kind of test was used? What sampling method was followed? Who funded the study? While these are important issues in the debating the results of the aforementioned study, I shall leave these issues to groups that have much more interest in the issue than I.   

I do not find the results of the study surprising. It does not surprise me that children of lesbian parents are psychologically well-adjusted. Why should a lesbian not be a good parent in terms of loving, providing, and caring for her child? I want children of lesbian parents to do well; I want them to be just as well-adjusted as children from homes with heterosexual parents. In a way, the results or this study are good news – I want psychologically well-adjusted kids no matter what the home environment is like. 

For me there is a more important issue that the study did not address. I want to know what effect growing up with lesbian parents has on one’s morals. Put differently, I want to know if the kids of lesbian parents are morally well-adjusted, in a Judaeo-Christian sense. Do they ever receive Christian teachings which tell them that homosexuality is a sin? Are they taught that sexual orientation is merely a matter of personal preference?

I suspect that lesbian parents are downplaying the Judaeo-Christian viewpoint which is that homosexuality is a sin. They are likely emphasizing the homosexual viewpoint which is that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle. So my concern does not center on psychological adjustment; it centers on moral adjustment. 

If lesbian parents are teaching their children that homosexuality is normal, then that teaching is contributing to the normalization of homosexuality in our society. This is a dangerous trend. The normalization of homosexuality could lead to our nation’s downfall. Mosiah put it this way: “if the time comes that the [greater] voice of the people doth choose iniquity, then is the time that the judgments of God will come upon you; yea, then is the time he will visit you with great destruction even as he has hitherto visited this land” (Mosiah 29:27).

The concern is not psychological adjustment; it is moral adjustment.
7 Comments
 
 
Lehi was a great philosopher whose philosophical contributions have been under recognized.  He contributed to humanity’s understanding of agency and ontology long before Aristotle (384 – 322 BC), Plato (427 – 347 BC), Socrates (469 – 399 BC), Confucius (circa 551 – 479 BC), and even Pythagoras (circa 580 - 500 BC).  We don’t hear much about his philosophical contributions because his ideas came out of the New World through a record hidden from the world for over a thousand years. 

Second Nephi, chapter 2 contains 4 major philosophical and theological truths that are worth mentioning.  They are (1) the symbiosis of good and evil, (2) the irrational implications of moral relativism, (3) the essential nature of moral agency, and (4) the symbiosis of joy and misery.

1.  The symbiosis of good and evil.  “For it must needs be that there is an opposition in all things.  If it were not so . . . righteousness could not be brought to pass. . . . Wherefore, all things must needs be compound in one.” (verse 11)

To a certain extent righteousness is defined by its opposite, evil, and evil is defined by its opposite, righteousness.  Righteousness is what it is because it is contrasted with evil, and evil is what it is because it is contrasted with righteousness.  When Lehi wrote that all things must be compounded into one, he was saying that if one ceased existing, the other would cease existing as well.  In modern day language we might say that righteousness and evil are two sides of the same coin.  One side of the coin relies on the other side for its existence.  Consider that if you removed the “heads” from a coin it would no longer be a coin, and thus the “tails” would cease to exist as well.  There are no "heads" without "tails", and there is no righteousness without evil.  

2.  The irrational implications of moral relativism.  “And if ye shall say there is no law, ye shall also say there is no sin.  If ye shall say there is no sin, ye shall also say there is no righteousness. . . . And if there be no righteousness . . . . [then] there is no God.  And if there is no God . . . there could have been no creation . . . [and] all things must have vanished away.” (verse 13) 

Moral relativism claims that there is no divine law governing what is good and bad behavior, and thus any behavior that feels good and does not hurt others is appropriate.  Relativism also asserts that, because there is no law, there is no sin or evil.  However, as Lehi pointed out, if there is no sin then there could be no righteousness because they are opposite sides of the same coin, and without righteousness there could be no God because He is perfect and glorified.  Finally, if there were no God there could be no creation and everything would vanish into nothingness.  But the universe is not in a state of nothingness because we know we are here.  The reality of our existence puts moral relativism on a shaky foundation.  When carried to its logical conclusion, it is an intellectually bankrupt enterprise. 

3.  The essential nature of moral agency.  “Wherefore, man could not act for himself save it should be that he was enticed by the one or the other.” (verse 16)

In this verse Lehi is referring to the power to choose between good and evil (moral agency).  There are two essential influences that must exist for mankind to exercise its moral agency and thus qualify for a kingdom of glory – they are the influences of good and evil.  We cannot qualify for exaltation without being enticed by evil influences (and eschewing them), and we cannot qualify for exaltation without being enticed by righteous influences (and choosing to follow them).  Evil enticements come from Satan and his followers, and righteous enticements come from the Spirit of the Lord.  Both are necessary for agency to exist.     

4.  The symbiosis of joy and misery.  “[W]herefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin.” (verse 23)

This verse refers to the essentiality of the Fall of Adam.  Adam and Eve could only feel true joy after falling from the presence of God and experiencing the misery that comes with telestial, mortal existence.  And so it goes with us.  Living through mortality with all its misery and suffering is essential if we are to truly understanding the joy that comes with the Plan of Redemption.  The Plan of Redemption is sometimes called the Plan of Happiness, and for good reason.  Those who experience redemption after enduring the trials of mortality will experience immense happiness.  This concept can be extended to other areas of life, such as that we appreciate the joys of health through sickness and we appreciate the joys of success through failure.  Of course, we do not need to purposely create misery, sickness, and failure to experience their opposites, these things just seem to find us in mortal existence.

In many respects, these profound ideas are superior to contributions from more recognizable philosophers who came centuries later. I think this makes Lehi one of the most under recognized philosophers in the history of the world.
7 Comments
 
 
Here I go with one of those I told you so moments.

A short while ago I posted an article on the pros and cons of the Canadian Healthcare model. (For those of you who do not know, Canada has government run, socialized medicine.) President Obama’s administration is in the process of building a similar model in the United States. 

One of the cons I mentioned in that post is that the Canadian model is not effective at controlling costs. That’s right, costs are spiraling out of control in Canada just like they are in the US. And on the other side of the ocean, healthcare costs are also rising sharply in most European nations with socialized medicine.

Funny thing is, the Democratic healthcare bill was passed largely to control spending. Apparently the current US administration didn’t look into what is happening to medical costs in socialized countries; if they had, they might have reconsidered. I suppose they think they can do socialized medicine better than the rest of the world.

Good luck!

And now I'll sign off with an amazing revelation:

Health care costs can only be controlled by reforming health care delivery, not by reforming healthcare insurance, which, unfortunately, is all the recent health care bill does.
7 Comments
 
Google Analytics