![]() The Lord told the first man to take care of the earth he made for him (Moses 3:15). Therefore, it seems important that Latter-day Saints be mindful of the planet they are given to dwell on. But what of all this discussion about Global Warming? Much in the way of doom and gloom is presented to the public for the future of our planet, and Global Warming has become a hot topic (pardon the pun). There’s no question that it is happening, but exactly what is causing it and whether it is something to fret over is debatable. To ask, “Is Global Warming real?” is not the proper question, but rather, “Is Global Warming caused by mankind?” Comments<i>New Scientist</i> has a treatment of climate change myths that I would recommend. Although contrary to a number of your arguments, I don't think you will find them to be alarmist.
Reply
Jack 12/30/2008 13:12
I'm waiting for a climatologist to show up and tell us that that's not the way it really works. But then the real problem begins--and that's: What do we do about what so many other climatologists are saying? The ones who agree with the author of this post?
Reply
Dave 12/30/2008 19:38
Ryan,
Reply
12/31/2008 14:33
Just out of curiosity did you both looking up the answers to points you raise such as the lag/lead in CO2 vs. temperature? There are pretty good explanations.
Reply
Jack 12/31/2008 16:38
I don't know, Clark. There's just too much disagreement. Even the petitions, with whatever weaknesses they may have, have been supported by a large enough number of informed people (ferreting out those who are truly unqualified) that one can't possibly ignore a growing trend of division. Plus, I think there can be a big difference between what organizations endorse and what individual scientists really believe.
Reply
kristine N 01/02/2009 08:37
Jack, if you think there's disagreement, it's because you're not talking to scientists. Those who disagree with the notion that global warming is man-made are few and pretty much on the fringe. Many of them are, as Clark suggests, not publishing in peer-reviewed journals. There's a growing trend of agreement, not division.
Reply
Jack 01/02/2009 21:01
Again, I don't know. It seems like a lot of skeptics are more concerned with modeling and the handling of data than they are with physical laws. Unfortunately, all too often, it can be one thing to say, "this is how things work" and quite another to say, "this is what's *really* happening."
Reply
Jack 01/06/2009 20:45
"The people who actually study this are in agreement"
Reply
Jack 01/07/2009 17:41
Here's a list of scientists who don't agree:
Reply
Jack 01/09/2009 12:44
Sorry to keep hammering on this--
Reply
Dave 01/09/2009 22:40
Jack,
Reply
Jack 01/10/2009 13:18
Dave,
Reply
Jack 01/10/2009 13:21
Ah,
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved. Leave a Reply | Welcome to the Religion and Science (R&S) Blog. Feel free to post your comments. Please be courteous. CategoriesAll ArchivesJanuary 2012 |




RSS Feed