Google Webmaster Tools
 
Picture
In a comment to my recent post on secular humanism, S.Faux pointed out that secular humanists are free to believe the way they do. This doctrine is found in Alma 30:7-9, which reads

Now there was no law against a man's belief; for it was strictly contrary to the commands of God that there should be a law which should bring men on to unequal grounds. For thus saith the scripture: Choose ye this day, whom ye will serve. Now if a man desired to serve God, it was his privilege; or rather, if he believed in God it was his privilege to serve him; but if he did not believe in him there was no law to punish him.

S. Faux is correct. According to the great Plan of Salvation, people are free to believe whatever they want and to do so without ridicule. This was the case with Korihor. Korihor was free to believe whatever he wanted without ridicule. 

In this post I explore the following question: If Korihor was free to believe whatever he wanted without retribution, then why was he called out by Alma for his abhorrent beliefs, and why did he pay such a hefty price?

Korihor was called out because he was “working devices that . . . destroy[ed] the children of God,” and his spreading of false doctrines was “bringing many souls down to destruction.” Alma warned Korihor that if he persisted, God would smite him so that he would “not deceive this people any more.”

“Why was Korihor called out and struck dumb?” Answer: He became an unrepentant anti-Christ social activist.

And so it goes with secular humanism. There are numerous secular humanists who keep their atheist views to themselves. I am fine with these folks. They have a right to their beliefs. I know and work with secular humanists who are good people. But those who become social activists for secular humanism have crossed the line, and I am calling them out. Specifically, I am calling out the secular humanism movement in America for propagating atheism in society. 

The following quote is a glimpse of what secular humanist activism is up to.

[Secular humanism] is a vibrant movement, and there have already been successes.  The newly formed Secular Coalition for America has brought the first lobbyist to Washington specifically representing the interests Secular Americans. Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) has "come out" as the first openly nontheistic congressman in American history.

The American Humanist Association initiated the first national advertising campaign promoting the notion of secular humanist identity, and now numerous groups around the country are doing the same.  We now have Camp Quest, a camp for children of nonreligious families, and we have education centers, legal centers, charities, student groups through the Secular Student Alliance, and local groups all around the country, all affirming the notion of secular identity.

The movement was assisted somewhat in recent years by a series of bestselling books debunking religion, and now awaits an important book to be released by HarperCollins this fall from Harvard Humanist Chaplain Greg Epstein, Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe, that promises to educate the public about the positive aspects of the humanist lifestance. Clearly, Secular Americans are emerging, and we have no intention of going back to the closet.

Secular Americans don't for a moment think that the election of Obama has eliminated the danger of the religious right. Critical thinking and rational public policy will not be secure until secular humanists have firmly established themselves as a recognized and respected demographic category, seen by the public, the press, and the government as being worthy of a seat at the table in the American public dialogue.  Obviously, there is much work to be done and this is no time for complacency.

(Source:
http://www.americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2009-08-why-secular-actvism.  For another list of secular humanist activism visit http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=29).

I agree with the last line. In these perilous times “there is much work to be done and there is no time for complacency.” If members of the LDS church and other Christian organizations do not recognize this movement and counter its influence, America may one day become very different nation. I don’t want my great grandkids living in a country where believers are the minority and America has become a predominantly secular nation because I failed to recognize the warning signs and did not take a stand.

 


Comments

Tim
09/23/2009 1:44pm

As an LDS missionary, I often got the same kind of response. Stuff like "you have no right to go around telling people what to believe."
It's nonsense when people are saying it to our missionaries, and it's nonsense when we tell it to others that we disagree with.
Are they sinning? I don't know. We'll all be judged based on what we know. Korihor was certainly sinning, as he knew God existed, and yet he still preached against him. I'm doubtful that most secular humanist today know that God exists--in fact, they see many of the evil things people do in the name of God, and are thus persuaded that he does not exist. I think the people who really need to be careful are those who claim they have God's directive for the horrible things they do--they are much more likely to lead people away from God than any secular humanist.

Reply
Dave C.
09/23/2009 2:53pm

Tim,

You raise a good point. Unfortunately this blog is limited to scientific/scholarly issues so I won't be writing about David Koresh and Jim Jones.

Reply
09/23/2009 8:37pm

Dave C:

I have never argued that "there is no harm in secular humanists believing the way they do." There is harm, just like there is harm in liberal politicians believing the way they do. I have simply argued that secular humanists, like liberal politicians, have the right to believe the way they do. Further, I argued from the Book of Mormon that there should not be laws against such beliefs.

There should be a battlefield of ideas. Clash with the secular humanists all you want. Just make sure you do your homework.

Blog request: It would be interesting to read your reactions to Richard Dawkin's "The Out Campaign."

Reply
Dave C.
09/23/2009 10:05pm

Sorry, S.Faux. I took your comment "I don't worry too much about secular humanists" to mean that there isn't much harm in being a secular humanist. I have changed the opening paragraph to reflect your corrections.

I don't see much harm in someone believing in secular humanism, except that the person is missing out on blessings from knowing the Lord.

Re: "Clash with the secular humanists all you want. Just make sure you do your homework."
- As far as the secular movement is concerned, I have. I have perused their websites and read much of their material.

Reply
Stan
09/24/2009 12:35am

"As far as the secular movement is concerned, I have. I have perused their websites and read much of their material."

Perhaps what Mr. Faux meant was you had better be prepared to defend your own position if by "Calling Out" you mean a direct frontal challenge.

I wonder if those who lead our children to a false God do as much or more damage. Where do we draw the line? How many different belief systems will need to be "Called Out"? You've seen the futility of the evolution vs. id discussions on this board. Will you be more successful convincing or discrediting humanists? Perhaps shoring up your defenses by building faith in your family and friends is more productive than a futile attempt to eliminate or diminish one of many adversaries. If a strong testimony cannot stand up to humanists then we are all sunk.

Reply
09/24/2009 7:02am

"Unfortunately this blog is limited to scientific/scholarly issues"

Well, at least the anti-scientific and anti-scholarly approach to scientific/scholarly issues.

I know a lot of secular humanists. None of them belong to, let alone are aware of, these organizations which claim to speak for humanists. Most humanist are not anti-religion, they are mostly uninterested. I think Christians and humanists have much good in common.

Have fun organizing your witch hunt.

Reply
Dave C.
09/24/2009 11:22am

Stan,

I am well prepared to defend my own position which is to expose secular humanism for its atheistic and agnostic propoganda. The writing is on the wall for all to read. It is a no brainer.

What's with all the warnings to "do your homework"?

Reply
Dave C.
09/24/2009 11:29am

Chris,

You have completely misread the purpose of this post. It is not to criticize secular humanists for their beliefs. It is to criticize secular humanist social activism.

Perhaps the following analogy will help you. I have not openly criticized homosexuals for harboring homosexual tendencies nor have I tried to restrain them from living their lives in private. However, I have openly criticized their activism which is to normalize the homosexual lifestyle.

I find it interesting that those who misread and understand my posts (which are very clearly written, BTW) are the same people who usually accuse me of being unscholarly and unscientific.

Critics like yourself often resort to ad hominem attacks when they realize they have run out of logical counter arguments.

Reply
Stan
09/24/2009 1:50pm

"I am well prepared to defend my own position which is to expose secular humanism for its atheistic and agnostic propoganda"

I think that is your agenda. Your position is that the advocacy of secular humanism is morally reprehensible. Being that this position arises from religious belief, you will need to defend those beliefs and why they are justified over secular beliefs. That is not easily done and thus why you need to do your homework. Your assumptions of truth and reality are not accepted by secular humanists and will therefore require justification on your part to engage in anything other than a shouting match. I'm just sayin.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply


Google Analytics