Google Webmaster Tools
 
I teach a college course on research design. One of the topics is surveys and privacy. I tell the students that marketing surveys are infamous for collecting people’s private information, especially those attached to product registration forms. 

Have you ever wondered what your income, age, and the number of people living in your house have to do with registering a new stereo or appliance? Nothing. Companies are collecting information for marketing purposes, and some of it is very personal. Being asked to surrender that kind of information is really no different than a stranger coming up to you on the street and asking:
1. What is your race?
2. How many people are in your home?
3. What are your hobbies?
4. Do you have credit cards? If so, how many?
5. How much money do you make?
6. How old are you?

Kind of freaky, eh? 

Many people don’t realize that this is an invasion of privacy, which might explain why many people don’t seem to realize that submitting to a scan or invasive pat down at the airport is also an invasion of privacy. Taking nude photos or touching the breasts of our wives and daughters at the airport is not a necessary evil to ensure safe travel – it is an unnecessary invasion of privacy, plain and freakin’ simple.

How did we get here? I don’t blame the president. I don’t blame the bosses at the TSA. I don’t even put all the blame on terrorists. I blame this invasion of privacy on those who have perpetuated the falsehood that it is wrong to profile.

“Oh no!” you say. We sheeple have been taught that it is wrong to profile (i.e., stereotype). “We can’t do that.”

Baloney. You do it all the time. That’s right. You stereotype all the time (i.e., form impressions of people based on past experience with similar looking and sounding people). You do it whenever you talk to a stranger. You do it whenever you walk away from a suspicious looking stranger. You do it whenever you ask someone for help on the side of the street or at a gas station. Stereotyping is human nature. Stereotypes are sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect - the fact that they are sometimes incorrect does not mean that we should ignore them. They are useful guides.

So enough already. Enough frisking of caucasian grandmothers with Utah accents. Enough patting down young American children who look like they’ve just gotten out of school. Enough frisking of WW II veterans carrying US passports. And enough taking nude photos of hispanic, native, black, and caucasian young women who dress and talk like Americans.

Enough already! 

See that foreigner over there who dresses and talks like an easterner and carries a Saudi Arabian passport? That is the guy you should be giving an enhanced pat down because he dresses and talks like the kind of people who are currently trying to kill us. See that American over there who is dressed like a gang banger and looks like he could have weapons stored in his baggy pants? That is the guy you should be taking nude photos of. See that foreigner over there with a one-way ticket who is not checking any luggage? That is the person who should be taken aside for questioning. 

Americans have been brained washed into thinking that stereotyping is un-American and a violation of our liberties. Rather than rely on useful stereotypes, we require everyone to go through nude body scanners or intrusive pat downs. In the name of preserving liberties (by not stereotyping), we’ve surrendered liberties (by subjecting everyone to scans). Are we living in some sort of bizzaro world?

A final note. No country faces more threats from terrorism than Israel, but Israel does not require its citizens to go through scanners or enhanced pat downs at airports. They don’t even have scanners. So how does Israel handle its security at airport check points? That’s right – it profiles. 

(Please, no comments on the definition of stereotyping. I’ve read, studied, and taught this subject. And no comments on whether the scanner photos are really nude photos – they are sufficiently revealing to raise concerns. Also, I oppose any kind of stereotyping [accurate & inaccurate] that results in harmful discrimination.) 
 


Comments

Rob Osborn
11/27/2010 09:47

While I agree that TSA has gone a little overboard with the body scans and pat downs, I do not think like many that it erodes our freedoms as much as people presume. We live in a country where freedom abounds and as such it makes us extremely vulnerable to attacks because it allows psychos (whether they be American, or any nationality) to move about and do things unchecked for the most part and then bring their evil designs to fruitation in very harmful matters.

I agree that profiling needs to be the number 1 priority but at the same time I also recognize that the threat of terror can come from any group. I remember that right after 9/11 i had to take a plane from my small town in Idaho up to Sea/tac in Washington. I was one of the people chosen at random to be fully searched. Yes, they made me take my shoes off, my belt off and then they took my whole baggade apart and checked everything. They even took apart my small pin light. They gave me a full body pat down. Never once did I feel that it was an invasion of my privacy. After all- it was I who chose to ride on a commercial flight. Sure, it was kind of silly, patting me down and looking through all my bags, but it sends a strong message to would-be highjackers that security is real and that they should think twice about trying to do anything with an airplane.

So, what is the answer? Kill off the freakin terrorists so that we can once again take advantage of a more enjoyable freedom.

The TSA has gone a little overboard on the one hand, but I do not feel that it goes into the territory of complete invasion of privacy. We live in a troubled time and in order to keep terrorist activities to a minimum we must send a message to them, whoever they may be, that our security measures are thourough.

I too wish they wouldn't have to grapple and pat our wives and children in areas that are private and uncomfortable to them. Perhaps they will come up with a different mode.

As for Israel, I remeber when they were having such a hard time with all of the suicide bombers on the busses. People were to the point of not riding the busses anymore. I believe Israel in this case were a little to relaxed about bus security which allowed the terrorists to move at will inflicting a considerable damage. So, how did they overcome it? The first big thing was that America killed off the Iraqi terror threat which was supporting the terror activities by supplying them with funds. What Israel should have done was to temporarily beef up security at bus stops including mobile body scanners, bomb sniffing dogs, and somewhat invasive body pat downs. At some point it sends a message to would-be terrorists that it is too hard to successfully try to bomb busses and thus make it harder to terrorize the people.

It is definately the terrorists that have created the problems we now face with the TSA. Yes, it is a loss of some of our privacy but how else to we provide the type of security that shuns future teorrorist activities?

We go and kill all the freakin teorrorists. That is the one and only answer.

Reply
11/29/2010 07:50

Profiling isn't just racial profiling, it's also behavioral. That's how you catch suspicious people from otherwise innocuous groups.

Reply
Dave C.
11/30/2010 09:36

Rob,

Thanks for your reply. I like hearing your opinion on my posts. We view things a bit differently on this issue, but we agree that profiling should be the number one priority. If we profiled people suspected of being a threat I think we wouldn't have all the added security measures at airport (scanners etc.).
I like your approach to dealing with terrorists - kill them. History has shown that thugs who kill innocent people don't know how to negotiate - they only know how to kill. The only way to deal with such people is to remove them from the planet. I would add another approach to dealing with terrorist, it is that America needs to return to her spiritual roots and more fully serve the Lord. If we did so I am certain that the Lord would soften the hearts of those who would kill us just as He softened the hearts of the Nephite's enemies. Unfortunately we seem to be turning away from the Lord as a nation.

Reply
12/02/2010 08:37



When the American people finally wake up and find out that Michael Chertoff had an economic tie to the company who makes these scanners, all hell will break loose concerning the "business" side of exposing America literally.

Chertoff is no more than a common thug n thief, giving life to unwarranted fear and panic by introducing a self-indulgent "technology" which benefits him directly and the "zio-cons" behind the whole "war on Terror" debacle.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply




Google Analytics