Google Webmaster Tools
 
Remember the alarm over the hole in the ozone layer? People were concerned, and with good reason. Without ozone in the atmosphere, the sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays would cook us ’till we’re medium rare. In 1987 the international community got on board with banning manmade substances deleterious to the ozone such as chlorofluorocarbons used in coolant systems and aerosol spray propellants. Reports have shown that our efforts have had a positive effect. By and large the ozone layer has been recovering.

What about the latest environmental scare - global warming? I don’t deny that the earth has been warming, although I am undecided on what is driving the warming. What, if anything, should be done about the warming?

I am totally onboard with judicious efforts to reduce emissions and take care of our environment. I recycle, plant trees in my yard, conserve energy, and furrow my brow at the sight of thick black smoke billowing out of some dude’s diesel-powered pickup truck. But sometimes doing something for the right reason can create more problems than it solves; this is especially true where environmentalism is concerned. Here are a few examples.

CFLs
Governments are banning incandescent light bulbs in favor of more eco-friendly, energy friendly compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs. Yet CFL bulbs contain mercury and must be disposed of in the proper manner. Prediction: If the US government bans the incandescent light bulb, our landfills will become toxic from the mercury contained in these bulbs.

Sulfur
When volcanoes erupt the sulfur they spew into the atmosphere has a slight cooling effect on the earth. The sulfur deflects solar radiation back into space. Some global warming “scholars” think we could put sulfur into the atmosphere to counteract global warming. Prediction: If governments start throwing sulfur into the atmosphere we will see acid rain falling from the sky.

CO2
The US EPA recently listed carbon dioxide as an environmental pollutant subject to regulation. Prediction: The EPA will set up a carbon credit (tax) program for the number of times you exhale in a day. Perhaps in retribution trees and vegetation will start limiting the amount of oxygen they ‘exhale’ in defiance of mankind’s efforts to cut off their supply of CO2.

Plastic bags
There’s a movement afoot to ban those thin plastic bags we get from the store. (Actually, I recycle mine and reuse them as garbage bags in the bathroom, but this is not enough for environmentalists.) Prediction: Thin plastic bags will be replaced with “environmentally friendly” lead-laden, reusable bags from China! Oh. Wait a minute. This prediction has already come true.

While heeding the Lord’s counsel to be wise stewards of our world. I believe this includes avoiding “fixes” that have the potential to create larger problems. 

 


Comments

04/10/2011 19:00

As we have discussed on M* many times, the global warming movement has jumped the shark. Every major predictions regarding warming, regarding sea level increase, regarding the total ice cover, regarding glacier melt has proven exaggerated or incorrect. Global warming alarmists have converted the movement into a faith-based -- not science-based -- cause.

If people want to voluntarily reduce their emissions, have at it. But a growing number of people will oppose the use of force to make other people accept the global warming religion.

I think there is potential promise in solar energy. I already use it somewhat at my house and am pondering installing a whole-house unit next year. It might pay for itself in five years or so, which is a fairly decent payoff. But I am making the choice because of economics, not because I am saving the planet.

Reply
Tim
04/11/2011 04:05

Corrections:

1. The government is not banning incandescent light bulbs. It's merely putting stricter energy requirements on them. Incandescent light bulbs that meet those stricter energy requirements are fine. In any case, the amount of mercury contained in CFL bulbs is very minimal.

2. Plastic bags--reusable bags make environmental and economic sense. They also are much sturdier. Just because some reusable bags might have issues doesn't mean we should throw out the whole concept. However, I also think recycling those grocery store bags as garbage bags is a perfectly fine idea. Also, many grocery stores recycle the bags.

3. CO2 can be a pollutant, just like anything else that has the potential to be too large. Argon and Neon are found naturally in air, yet no one is disputing that they too can be pollutants. CO2 is the same way. Too much of it is a bad thing. And most plants do not do better with increased CO2.

Reply
Dave C.
04/15/2011 12:41

Geoff,

Right on. We can be wise stewards of the earth's resources without resorting to drastic measures.

Tim,

Governments in the European Union have banned the good old light bulb. I am pleased to hear that our government may not be doing the same.

I can't go with reusable bags until a bunch of kids leave home.

Thanks for dropping by.

Reply
George
04/18/2011 06:09

The answer is yes. Anything can run amok, including -- especially -- religion.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply




Google Analytics