Google Webmaster Tools
 
The apostle Paul prophesied that the Spirit of Truth would be poured out upon the earth in the latter days. This Spirit has moved science forward at an impressive rate. We regularly witness discoveries in medicine, technology, physics, chemistry, and biology. Discoveries in these and other fields of science bring blessings of truth, hope, healing, comfort, and the ability to accomplish things in a manner unfathomable to previous generations.

Yet in our fast paced, high tech world we must not lose sight of the blessings the Lord has already given us. Take herbs, for example. We’ve all heard and read claims that herbs are great for common ailments, but if you are like me, you are skeptical. It would be nice if there was rigorous testing of medicinal herbs, similar to the rigorous testing of pharmaceuticals. The inability to patent a natural substance makes widespread, rigorous testing of herbs unlikely. Whether we like it or not, rigorous testing of medicinal remedies is made possible by financial returns on patentable medicinal substances.

Do herbs have medicinal properties? Yes. How do I know? I have taken a few herbal remedies but cannot point to any particular instance where they were clearly effective; so I have no personal experience to assert that herbs effectively treat ailments. I’ve also perused books on herbal remedies, but the research the authors cite on herbal medicinal properties are scant and lack rigorous clinical control; so there isn’t even an impressive body of research to support the claim that herbs are clearly effective. Well then, how can we be sure that herbs work? Because the Lord said they work.

Consider the following scriptural verses.

1. Yea, and the herb, and the good things which come of the earth, whether for food or for raiment . . . are made for the benefit and the use of man . . . to strengthen the body (Doctrine and Covenants 59:18-20).

2. And whosoever among you are sick, and have not faith to be healed, but believe, shall be nourished with all tenderness, with herbs and mild food (D&C 42:43).

3. And there were some who died with fevers, which at some seasons of the year were very frequent in the land—but not so much so with fevers, because of the excellent qualities of the many plants and roots which God had prepared to remove the cause of diseases, to which men were subject by the nature of the climate (Alma 46:40).

4. And again, verily I say unto you, all wholesome herbs God hath ordained for the constitution, nature, and use of man (D&C 89:10). (Note that constitution, as the word is used here, refers to bodily strength and stamina.)

Modern medicine is great, but sometimes I wonder if we are missing out on another area of healing by not researching herbs as rigorously as we research modern therapies. It would be great if companies would aggressively research the efficacy, side effects, and proper dosing of herbs. Because natural remedies are not patentable, there is no financial incentive to conduct such research. Thus we are left in the dark on how and why herbs work.


 


Comments

Howard
05/16/2011 4:57pm

I use Boswellia (frankincense) plus turmeric for reducing inflammation and pain and consider it about half as effective as other NSAIDs pill for pill so double up. Studies to the contrary for benign prostate enlargement Saw Palmentto keeps me from peeing in Morse code. Garlic is a weak antibiotic. Milk Thistle is the most effective liver protection one can buy including Rx.

Reply
el oso
05/16/2011 6:01pm

There is extensive research into effectiveness of many herbs. It is usually done or compiled by one of the companies who use it in their formulation of some natural remedy. Frankincense only has 4,000+ years of history, and many other herbs have long histories of use.
It is good that many natural herbs do not get full clinical trials. They would be ridiculously expensive and used even less than now.

Reply
Dave C.
05/17/2011 11:01am

Howard,

Thanks for sharing! I find the connection between herbs and health fascinating. Hopefully others will chime in on some other connections.

el oso,

I agree that clinical trials would make herbal remedies too expensive. At the same time, relatively low interest in studying herbal remedies among pharmaceutical companies means that we are missing out on potentially useful applications.

Reply
Steve
05/17/2011 12:01pm

Reply
Steve
05/17/2011 12:12pm

I am going to give the alternative view.

Most herbs are flat-out quackery.

The health effects are neglgible but the quai-religious fervor in support of particular concoctions is often plain bizzare.

Have cancer? Skip the chemo and take something from the natural foods store. Have diabetes? Stop taking insulin and take this or that. Everyday Mormons and others embrace this dangerous silliness.

Worst is to combine magic herbs with mult-level. Utah is rife with these companies. And, they use herbs, exotic fruits and other formulations to ruin families, deceive consumers and perpetuate fraud.

In the 19th century, herbs were the best available. Today, they are a negative force.

Reply
Howard
05/18/2011 1:32am

<em>Most herbs are flat-out quackery.</em> So are most Rx drugs they only work on about one out of four people and many are just barely better than placebo maybe not technically quackery but what good are they? Most herbs are much safer than most Rx drugs many have been used safely by man for thousands of years. I certainly wouldn't use herbs to treat cancer or serious disease nor do I support the herbal MLM craze but they have been effective for me for the things I mentioned. Today Big Pharma is a much bigger negative force than herbs will ever be.

Reply
Steve
05/18/2011 7:37am

Howard --

I have to completely disagree with the notion that herbs are "safer".

Every "dosage" varies dramatically in terms of active ingredients. Many contain pesticides and other foreign substances. Most importantly, the evidence for efficacy is based on anecdotes, not scientific evidence.

Pharmaceuticals have to have a proven track record to be on the market. Vaccines prevent/reduce the occurrence of diseases. Insulin allows diabetics to live a normal life. Anti-cholesterol medications minimize heart disease.

There is simply no comparison.

Embracing herbs -- in my estimation -- has as much validity as calling in a witch doctor for illness.

The fraud is that so many use herbs to treat true illnesses. My personal belief is that the entire industry is fraud and should be treated accordingly.

Reply
Howard
05/18/2011 9:35am

Steve herbs are food not chemicals, compare the side effects to Rx drugs. Your strawberries contain pesticides and other foreign substances is that causing you concern? Who cares if there is little science for efficacy they are inexpensive all but a few are safer than drinking a cup of coffee and that's why they are available without a prescription can you say that about Rx drugs? No. Pharmaceuticals have a proven track record of serious side effects including death. Embracing herbs has the validity of the Biblical history of human experience and comes with God's recommendation. What about the fraud of chemotherapy for treating many types of cancer do oncology patients get well and go home or do they spend what's left of their life savings at the hospital before being buried? As I stated previously I do not advocate using herbs to treat serious disease.

Reply
Steve
05/18/2011 11:28am

Howard --

The attitude you are reflecting is what I consider so dangerous.

Modern medicine has boosted life spans by nearly 40 years. Today, we struggle with chronic diseases because we live long enough to get them. I have one and take a medication three times a day. If I don't, I would be dead in about a month. Cancers that used to kill most today have high survival rates (mostly from chemo, radiation, etc.).

Herbs are used to opt out of modern medecine. People claim they are natural, that are embraced by God, that the Pharma companies are trying to supress, etc. Just remember the era of herbs had lifespans in the forties and people died of many common illnesses. There is absolutely no evidence of any real health benefit from herbs -- with a few small exceptions.

Reply
Howard
05/18/2011 12:18pm

There is nothing dangerous about my attitude I challenge you to support your unfounded claim. Increased lifespan was boosted by safety sanitation vaccines and antibiotics but what has been cured by modern medicine since polio? Almost nothing. Big Pharma and Big Medicine are unfortunately strongly profit motivated and therefore more focused on treatment than cure and the legal profession keeps them practicing defensive medicine by ordering unnecessary tests and images further driving up the cost. If US medicine is so great why do Sweden, Norway, Finland, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore have infant mortality rates half of ours? I use Policosanol as a side effect free substitute for a statin drug with similar results is this what you mean by opting out of modern medicine?

Reply
Kris
05/18/2011 5:39pm

I, personally, have seen hundreds of people helped with herbs. This is an argument that is banned in my family. The two sides will never meet.

Reply
Steve
05/18/2011 9:17pm

Howard --

If you want to take a plan wax with no evidence of efficacy (except in studies by the producer, the Cuban government), more power to you.

As to the impact of modern, it is curious that you embrace parts (vaccines) but denounce others (pharmaceuticals).

But I think my point was made by Kris. The backing for herbs is individual stories, not any demonstrable effect.

And, that is exactly what leads to people abandoning proven modern methods for herbal folk medicine. I've known several folks who have taken that route -- and died as a result.

Of note, both the Church and GAs take the modern approach (try to go an mission taking an herbal preparation instead of a modern treatment).

Reply
Howard
05/18/2011 9:52pm

Steve you're not listening Cuban studies aside that wax puts my personal blood values right next to American pharmaceutical's statin drugs without the risk of side effects so who needs a study? Btw who do you think does American pharmaceutical drug testing some independent lab?

Reply
Steve
05/18/2011 10:11pm

Howard --

The non-Cuban studies indicate no medicinal effect. In your case you may be seeing the placebo effect. This is an herb that has been tested. -- to no effect.

I remember the magnets craze a few years ago. All kinds of folks claimed it helped their arthritis, etc. In reality, they didn't do a darn thing.

By the way, drug companies do have to do third party studies (I've been in a couple).

Reply
Howard
05/18/2011 11:02pm

Steve I've been successfully on Policosanol for 8 years now that would be quite an extended placebo effect if it is placebo good for me and who cares it's working it's inexpensive and it's safe but bad for the statin drug companies because it means that their drugs aren't much more powerful than a wax placebo. Third party drug testers yes independent NO I know someone who owns a drug testing company.

Reply
Steve
05/19/2011 8:40pm

Howard --

Here's the evidence available.

Cuban studies claim efficacy.

The first independent study in Germany showed it as ineffective. Additional U.S. and European studies showed no impact from versions made from items besides sugar cane.

That's it.

If you are seeing results, good for you. But, the results don't appear reproducible.

Reply
Howard
05/19/2011 8:51pm

Steve please provide links and I'll have a look.

Reply
Steve
05/19/2011 9:20pm



http://www.bidmc.org/YourHealth/HealthResearchJournals.aspx?ChunkID=128614

Reply
Howard
05/19/2011 10:30pm

Steve I hope you don't expect to invalidate all the previous studies with a single outcome. From your article; "More than 80 clinical trials have suggested that Cuban sugar cane policosanol has cholesterol-lowering effects comparable with statins. But since a single research group in Cuba conducted most of these studies, the results need to be verified by other research groups...These findings indicate that policosanol *may not* have the cholesterol-lowering effects seen in previous studies."

Policosanol does not work for everyone but by monitoring individual blood levels it can be determined who it works on and who not without this screening you mix responders with non responders diluting the outcome.

Reply
Steve
05/20/2011 6:21pm

Howard,

I looked at a list of the studies.

The only ones showing a result are the Cuban ones and one out of Argentina paid for by them.

All the third party ones in the US and Europe show no effect.

Reply
Howard
05/21/2011 9:47pm

Steve links please.

Reply
Kyle
08/19/2011 10:20pm

Steve!?,

Do you work for a pharmaceutical company? There are volumes of published research demonstrating the benefits of herbal medicine. Look into the German E Commission.

Your prejudice and passion in opposing herbs in favor of prescription drugs taken as prescribed(which according to the AMA kills 200,000 people per year) is suspect. BTW - last year there was 1 (one) death that was attributed to the use of herbal medicine - and that is under question.

Reply
Steve W.
09/13/2012 4:06pm

There IS an herb combination that has a patent! The first one! There are 5 healing herbs that have been used for thousands of years in traditional medicine, and recently they discovered that a combination of these 5 herbs have a synergistic effect 18 times more powerful than each used individually. This was an important enough discovery to score 4 patents! Patents #7,241,461; #7,384,655; #7,579,026; and #7,923,045. Also see pubmed.gov "protandim" for the 10 published studies in peer-reviewed medical journals.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply


Google Analytics